- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-3/23: Judgment of the General Court of 26 June 2024 – UA v EUAA (Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – National criminal proceedings – OLAF investigation – Article 22 of the Staff Regulations – Serious misconduct in the course of the performance of duties – Financial liability of the member of temporary staff – Right to be heard – Causal link – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Compensation for damage suffered by the European Union – Liability)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TA0003
62023TA0003
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/4723
5.8.2024
(Case T-3/23)
(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - National criminal proceedings - OLAF investigation - Article 22 of the Staff Regulations - Serious misconduct in the course of the performance of duties - Financial liability of the member of temporary staff - Right to be heard - Causal link - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Compensation for damage suffered by the European Union - Liability)
(C/2024/4723)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: UA (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Agency for Asylum (represented by: P. Eyckmans, M. Stamatopoulou and C. Allante, acting as Agents, and by T. Bontinck and A. Guillerme, lawyers)
Re:
By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, the annulment of Decision EUAA/MB/2022/019 of the European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA) of 3 March 2022 in so far as it orders him to make good the damage suffered by the European Union as a result of serious misconduct on his part in the course of the performance of his duties and, second, compensation for the damage which he allegedly suffered as a result of that decision.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders UA to pay the costs.
—
Language of the case: French.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4723/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—