I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-661/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Aarhus Convention - Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Impact assessment report and other documents relating to a legislative initiative in the environmental field - Implied refusal of access - Express decision adopted after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 284/54)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: ClientEarth AISBL (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: O. Brouwer, B. Verheijen and T. van Helfteren, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Ehrbar and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, ClientEarth AISBL, seeks annulment of the implied decision of the European Commission of 30 July 2021 rejecting the confirmatory application for access to several documents relating to deforestation and forest degradation.
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The European Commission is to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 24, 17.1.2022.
Language of the case: English
* * *