I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2015/C 406/41)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Pagkyprios organismos ageladotrofon Dimosia Ltd (POA) (Latsia, Cyprus) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the Commission to accept the dossier CY/PDO/0005/01243 lodged by the authorities of the Republic of Cyprus as meeting the conditions laid down by Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 21 November 2012, on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ 2012 L 343, p. 1), as provided by Article 50 (1) of this regulation, and to proceed to its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union with reference 2015/C 246/12;
—order the Commission to pay the costs of the applicant.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment of the Commission on the conformity of the application CY/PDO/0005/01243 with Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012
—The application CY/PDO/0005/01243 departs from the standard CYS 94 (Part 1 & 2) 1985 concerning the milk content in the ‘Halloumi’ production process.
—The application CY/PDO/0005/01243 violates Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012.
2.Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission did not verify the compliance of application CY/PDO/0005/01243 with the procedure laid down by Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012
—No reasonable time was given for the right to appeal.
—The national authorities failed to scrutinize properly the objection raised by the applicant.