- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-649/23, Institutul G. Călinescu: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție (Romania) lodged on 31 October 2023 — Institutul de Istorie și Teorie Literară ‘G. Călinescu’, Fundația Națională pentru Știință și Artă v HK, heir of TB, VP, GR
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0649
62023CN0649
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2024/1389
19.2.2024
(C/2024/1389)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellants in the appeal on a point of law, appellants on appeal and defendants at first instance: Institutul de Istorie și Teorie Literară ‘G. Călinescu’, Fundația Națională pentru Știință și Artă
Defendants in the appeal on a point of law, defendants on appeal and applicants at first instance: HK, heir of TB, VP
Defendant in the appeal on a point of law and defendant at first instance: GR
Question referred
Must Article 2(a) of Directive 2001/29/EC (1) be interpreted as meaning that a critical edition of a work, the purpose of which is to produce an authoritative version of the text of an original work, by consulting the manuscript, accompanied by comments and the requisite critical apparatus, may be regarded as a work protected by copyright?
Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1389/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)