I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark RATPAC - Earlier national word mark RAT PACK - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity of the services - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(C/2025/1108)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Rat Pack Filmproduktion GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: S. Schmidt and P. Baronikians, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: RatPac Entertainment LLC (Encino, California, United States) (represented by: H. Gauß and N. Vachova, lawyers)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 January 2024 (Case R 877/2023-5).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Rat Pack Filmproduktion GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and RatPac Entertainment LLC in the proceedings before the General Court.
—
Language of the case: English.
OJ C C/2024/3084, 13.5.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1108/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
ECLI:EU:C:2025:1108
15