- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-217/13: Action brought on 15 April 2013 — Saf-Holland v OHIM (INTEGRAL)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TN0217
62013TN0217
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.6.2013
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 189/25
(Case T-217/13)
2013/C 189/53
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Saf-Holland GmbH (Bessenbach, Germany) (represented by M.-C. Seiler, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 31 January 2013 in Case R 2087/2011-1;
—Amend the contested decision in such a way that the preceding refusal decision of OHIM of 14 September 2011 is annulled;
—In the alternative, amend the contested decision in such a way that the registration procedure is continued;
—Order OHIM to pay the costs including those incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: the word mark INTEGRAL for goods and services in Classes 9, 12, 35 and 37 — Community trade mark application No 9 508 466
Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected
Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009