- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-116/21: Action brought on 22 February 2021 — Maternus v EUIPO — adp Gauselmann (WILD)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0116
62021TN0116
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.4.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 148/22
(Case T-116/21)
(2021/C 148/31)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Maternus GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: M. Zoebisch and R. Drozdz, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: adp Gauselmann GmbH (Espelkamp, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark WILD — European Union trade mark No 9 515 248
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 December 2020 in Case R 932/2019-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of the first sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) and Article 59(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.