EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-19/14: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sozialgericht Duisburg — Germany) — Ana-Maria Talasca, Angelina Marita Talasca v Stadt Kevelaer (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Absence of sufficient information concerning the factual and regulatory background to the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014CB0019

62014CB0019

July 3, 2014
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

15.9.2014

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/32

(Case C-19/14) (<span class="super">1</span>)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of the European Union - Absence of sufficient information concerning the factual and regulatory background to the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility))

2014/C 315/51

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Ana-Maria Talasca, Angelina Marita Talasca

Defendant: Stadt Kevelaer

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Sozialgericht Duisburg (Germany), made by decision of 17 December 2013, is manifestly inadmissible.

Language of the case: German.

* * *

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 142, 12.5.2014.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia