- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-479/20: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — Eurobolt and Others v Commission (Dumping — Extension of the anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China to imports consigned from Malaysia — Compliance with a judgment of the Court of Justice — Article 266 TFEU — Re-imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty — Non-retroactivity — Effective judicial protection — Principle of good administration — Competence of the author of the act)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0479
62020TA0479
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.7.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 284/25
(Case T-479/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Dumping - Extension of the anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China to imports consigned from Malaysia - Compliance with a judgment of the Court of Justice - Article 266 TFEU - Re-imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty - Non-retroactivity - Effective judicial protection - Principle of good administration - Competence of the author of the act)
(2022/C 284/29)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: Eurobolt BV (’s-Heerenberg, Netherlands), Fabory Nederland BV (Tilburg, Netherlands), ASF Fischer BV (Lelystad, Netherlands), Stafa Group BV (Maarheeze, Netherlands) (represented by: S. De Knop, B. Natens and A. Willems, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and G. Luengo, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/611 of 30 April 2020 re-imposing the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of certain iron or steel fasteners consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not (OJ 2020 L 141, p. 1).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Eurobolt BV, Fabory Nederland BV, ASF Fischer BV and Stafa Group BV to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 304, 14.9.2020.