- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-912/19: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Agrimotion S.A. v ADAMA Deutschland GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Placing of plant protection products on the market — Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Article 52(1) — Parallel trade permit — Personal nature of that permit)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0912
62019CA0912
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
3.5.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 163/7
(Case C-912/19)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Placing of plant protection products on the market - Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 - Article 52(1) - Parallel trade permit - Personal nature of that permit)
(2021/C 163/09)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Agrimotion S.A.
Defendant: ADAMA Deutschland GmbH
Operative part of the judgment
Article 52(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC must be interpreted as meaning that only the holder of a parallel trade permit may place a plant protection product on the market in the Member State which granted that permit.
OJ C 95, 23.3.2020.