- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-224/24: Action brought on 22 April 2024 – YL v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0224
62024TN0224
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/3782
(Case T-224/24)
(C/2024/3782)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: YL (represented by: A. Guillerme and T. Bontinck, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the Council of the European Union of 30 May 2023 not to extend the applicant’s term of office (‘the contested decision’);
—order the Council to pay a compensation for the material and moral harm suffered by the applicant due to the contested decision;
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that the decision of the Council of 30 May 2023 is vitiated by procedural flaws, namely the incompetence of the author of the acts adopted in the process leading to the adoption of the contested decision, considering:
—the incompetence of the Management Board of the EUIPO to adopt the decision of 22 November 2022;
—the infringement of the applicant’s right to be heard.
2.Second plea in law, alleging that the Council committed manifest errors of assessment when adopting the contested decision.
3.Third plea in law, alleging that the Council infringed the principles of legitimate expectations and non-discrimination.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3782/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—