EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-84/13 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 July 2014 — Electrabel SA v European Commission (Appeal — Concentration of undertakings — Commission decision — Order for payment of a fine — Infringement of Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 — Control of concentrations between undertakings — Article 14(3) — Criteria to be taken into account in determining the amount of the fine — Taking into account the duration of the infringement — Principle of non-retroactivity of the law — Application of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 — Obligation to state reasons)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013CA0084

62013CA0084

July 3, 2014
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/6

(Case C-84/13 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)

((Appeal - Concentration of undertakings - Commission decision - Order for payment of a fine - Infringement of Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 - Control of concentrations between undertakings - Article 14(3) - Criteria to be taken into account in determining the amount of the fine - Taking into account the duration of the infringement - Principle of non-retroactivity of the law - Application of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 - Obligation to state reasons))

2014/C 292/07

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Electrabel SA (represented by: M. Pittie and P. Honoré, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito, V. Di Bucci and A. Bouquet, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the appeal;

2.Orders Electrabel SA to pay the costs.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 129, 4.5.2013.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia