- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-747/24, Drocha: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 28 October 2024 – Bank Millennium S.A. v PA
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0747
62024CN0747
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/531
3.2.2025
(Case C-747/24, Drocha)
(C/2025/531)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Party initiating the proceedings before the referring court: Bank Millennium S.A.
Other party to the proceedings: PA
Question referred
Must Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts and the principles of effectiveness, equivalence, proportionality, legal certainty and of the right of access to a court or tribunal be interpreted as precluding a judicial interpretation of national legislation according to which the limitation period for a seller or supplier’s claim against a consumer for the repayment of undue payments made under a contract that has become null and void because it contains unfair terms starts to run from the date on which the consumer questioned the bank regarding the binding nature of the contractual terms?
—
The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/531/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
Language of the case: Polish.