EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-303/16: Judgment of the General Court of 26 January 2022 — Mylan IRE Healthcare v Commission (Medicinal products for human use — Orphan medicinal products — Marketing authorisations for the medicinal products Tobramycin VVB and associated names — Derogation from the market exclusivity of Tobi Podhaler, containing the active substance tobramycin — Article 8(3)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 — Concept of ‘significant benefit’ — Concept of ‘clinical superiority’ — Article 3(2) and (3)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 847/2000 — Duty of care — Manifest error of assessment)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TA0303

62016TA0303

January 26, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/31

(Case T-303/16) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Medicinal products for human use - Orphan medicinal products - Marketing authorisations for the medicinal products Tobramycin VVB and associated names - Derogation from the market exclusivity of Tobi Podhaler, containing the active substance tobramycin - Article 8(3)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 - Concept of ‘significant benefit’ - Concept of ‘clinical superiority’ - Article 3(2) and (3)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 847/2000 - Duty of care - Manifest error of assessment)

(2022/C 119/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Mylan IRE Healthcare Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: I. Vernimme, M. Campolini and D. Gillet, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Mifsud-Bonnici and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: UAB VVB (Kaunas, Lithuania) (represented by: E. Rivas Alba, V. Horcajuelo Rivera and M. Martens, lawyers)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2016) 2083 final of 4 April 2016 concerning, in the framework of Article 29 of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the marketing authorisations for ‘Tobramycin VVB and associated names’, medicinal products for human use which contain the active substance ‘tobramycin’.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Mylan IRE Healthcare Ltd to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and by UAB VVB, including those relating to procedure for the replacement of a party.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 296, 16.8.2016.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia