- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-267/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 17 April 2018 — Delta Antrepriză de Construcții și Montaj 93 SA v Compania Națională de Administrare a Infrastructurii Rutiere SA
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CN0267
62018CN0267
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-267/18)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Delta Antrepriză de Construcții și Montaj 93 SA
Defendant: Compania Națională de Administrare a Infrastructurii Rutiere SA
Question referred
Can Article 57(4)(g) of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (1) be interpreted as meaning that the termination of a public works contract on the ground that part of the works was subcontracted without the contracting authority’s authorisation constitutes a significant or persistent deficiency in the performance of a substantive requirement under a prior public contract leading to an economic operator being excluded from participation in a public procurement procedure?
* Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65.