I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2016/C 106/44)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Sovena Portugal — Consumer Goods, SA (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: D. Martins Pereira, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mueloliva, SL (Cordoba, Spain)
Applicant: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark ‘FONTOLIVA’ — International registration No 1 107 792 designating the European Union
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 November 2015 in Case R 1813/2014-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—admit this action;
—dismiss the contested decision in its entirety;
—rectify the contested decision, based on the grounds in this action and declare the granting of protection to International Trademark No 1 107 792 FONTOLIVA in respect of the European Union;
—condemn OHIM in the incurred expenses by the applicant, including the expenses made in the case which run with OHIM;
—condemn the other party in the case to bear the applicant’s costs in the OHIM proceedings.
—Lapse of earlier Spanish trademark No 780 071 FUENOLIVA;
—Insufficiency of the evidence of genuine use of earlier trademark;
—Inexistence of likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) CTMR;
—Existence of two earlier trademarks FONTOLIVA in Spain.