- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-229/16: Order of the General Court of 19 March 2018 –Pio de Bragança v EUIPO — Ordem de São Miguel da Ala (QUIS UT DEUS) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark QUIS UT DEUS — Failure to apply for renewal of registration of the mark — Cancellation of the mark upon expiry of the registration — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TB0229
62016TB0229
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.5.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 166/29
(Case T-229/16)(1)
((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark QUIS UT DEUS - Failure to apply for renewal of registration of the mark - Cancellation of the mark upon expiry of the registration - No need to adjudicate))
(2018/C 166/38)
Language of the case: Portuguese
Parties
Applicant: Duarte Pio de Bragança (Sintra, Portugal) (represented by: J. Sardinha, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Zaera Cuadrado, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ordem de São Miguel da Ala (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: J. Motta Veiga, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 February 2016 (Case R 621/2015-2), relating to revocation proceedings between Duarte Pio De Bragança and Ordem de São Miguel da Ala.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Each party shall bear its own costs.
(1) OJ C 270, 25.7.2016.