I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-90/16) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Exemption for supplies of services closely linked to sport - Concept of ‘sport’ - Activity characterised by a physical element - Duplicate bridge))
(2017/C 437/09)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: The English Bridge Union Limited
Defendant: Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Article 132(1)(m) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that an activity such as duplicate bridge, which is characterised by a physical element that appears to be negligible, is not covered by the concept of ‘sport’ within the meaning of that provision.
(<span class="super note-tag">1</span>) OJ C 145, 25.4.2016.