I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(C/2025/1551)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: DecoTrend (Weiden in der Oberpfalz, Germany) (represented by: C. Klawitter, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: B.K.Licht GmbH & Co. KG (Munich, Germany)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant
Design at issue: EU design (lampshades) – EU design No 4 031 201-0004
Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 November 2024 in Case R 102/2023-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and, as the case may be, the intervener to pay the costs.
Infringement of Article 60(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1551/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—