EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-99/08: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 17 November 2009 — Di Prospero v Commission (Staff case — Open Competition — Anti-fraud sector — Competition notice EPSO/AD/116/08 and EPSO/AD/117/08 — Lack of possibility for candidates to apply for several open competitions simultaneously — Refusal to admit the applicant to open competition EPSO/AD/117/08)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008FA0099

62008FA0099

January 1, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

30.1.2010

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/76

(Case F-99/08)

(Staff case - Open Competition - Anti-fraud sector - Competition notice EPSO/AD/116/08 and EPSO/AD/117/08 - Lack of possibility for candidates to apply for several open competitions simultaneously - Refusal to admit the applicant to open competition EPSO/AD/117/08)

2010/C 24/141

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Rita Di Prospero (Uccle, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and B. Eggers, acting as Agents)

Re:

Annulment of EPSO’s decision to not admit the applicant to open competition EPSO/AD/117/08.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1.Annuls the decision of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) to not allow Mrs Di Prospero to apply for open competition EPSO/AD/117/08;

2.Orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear all of the costs.

(1) OJ C 69, 21.3.2009, p. 54.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia