I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
29.7.2024
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark GPAY - Earlier national figurative mark ePay - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/4585)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Google LLC (Mountain View, California, United States) (represented by: C. Schmitt and M. Kinkeldey, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova and T. Frydendahl, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: EPay AD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: V. Pavlov and M. Lazarov, lawyers)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 30 November 2022 (Case R 1761/2021-4).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Google LLC to pay the costs.
—
Language of the case: English.
OJ C 121, 3.4.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4585/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
* Language of the case: English.