- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Joined Cases C-21/19 to C-23/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden — Netherlands) — Criminal proceedings against XN (C-21/19), YO (C-22/19), P.F. Kamstra Recycling BV (C-23/19) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Waste — Shipments — Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 — Waste subject to the prior written notification and consent procedure — Article 1(3) — Shipments subject to approval requirements — Directive 2008/98/EC — Article 5(1) — Concept of ‘by-products’ — Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 — Article 3, point 1 — Concept of ‘animal by-products’ — Shipments of a mixture of animal by-products and other material)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0021
62019CA0021
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 378/6
(Joined Cases C-21/19 to C-23/19) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Waste - Shipments - Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 - Waste subject to the prior written notification and consent procedure - Article 1(3) - Shipments subject to approval requirements - Directive 2008/98/EC - Article 5(1) - Concept of ‘by-products’ - Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 - Article 3, point 1 - Concept of ‘animal by-products’ - Shipments of a mixture of animal by-products and other material)
(2020/C 378/07)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties in the main proceedings
Operative part of the judgment
1.Article 5(1) of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives and Article 3, point 1, of Regulation No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 (Animal by-products Regulation) must be interpreted as meaning that a material which cannot be classified as a ‘by-product’ within the meaning of the former provision may nevertheless be regarded as an ‘animal by-product’ within the meaning of the latter provision.
2.Article 1(3)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 on shipments of waste, as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 135/2012 of 16 February 2012, must be interpreted as meaning that shipments of animal by-products falling within Regulation No 1069/2009 are excluded from the scope of Regulation No 1013/2006, as amended by Regulation No 135/2012, except in cases where Regulation No 1069/2009 expressly provides for the application of Regulation No 1013/2006, as amended by Regulation No 135/2012.
3.Article 1(3)(d) of Regulation No 1013/2006, as amended by Regulation No 135/2012, must be interpreted as meaning that that provision applies to the shipment of a mixture of Category 3 animal by-products, within the meaning of Article 10 of Regulation No 1069/2009, and other material, classified as non-hazardous waste, within the meaning of Regulation No 1013/2006, as amended by Regulation No 135/2012. The proportion of animal by-products in the mixture is not relevant in that regard.
* Language of the case: English.
(*) OJ C 139, 15.4.2019.