- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-220/11: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2012 — TeamBank v OHIM — Fercredit Servizi Finanziari (f@ir Credit) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark f@ir Credit — Earlier Community figurative mark FERCREDIT — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TA0220
62011TA0220
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.10.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 331/22
(Case T-220/11) (*)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark f@ir Credit - Earlier Community figurative mark FERCREDIT - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
(2012/C 331/39)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: TeamBank AG Nürnberg (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by: T. Kiphuth, H. Lindner and D. Terheggen, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: R. Manea and G. Schneider, agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court: Fercredit Servizi Finanziari SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: G. Petrocchi, A. Masetti Zannini de Concina and R. Cartella, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 February 2011 (Case R 719/2010-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Fercredit Servizi Finanziari SpA and TeamBank AG Nürnberg.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court rules:
1.The action is dismissed.
2.TeamBank AG Nürnberg is ordered to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: German.
OJ C 194, 2.7.2011.