- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-97/07: Order of the Court of First Instance of 10 April 2008 — Imelios v Commission (Application for annulment — Action for damages — Fifth framework programme of the Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (1998-2002) — Arbitration clause — Debit note — Inadmissible)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62007TB0097
62007TB0097
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.6.2008
Official Journal of the European Union
C 158/17
(Case T-97/07)
(Application for annulment - Action for damages - Fifth framework programme of the Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (1998-2002) - Arbitration clause - Debit note - Inadmissible)
(2008/C 158/26)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Imelios SA (Velizy-Villacoublay, France) (represented by: C. Curtil, lawyer)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Ladenburger and E. Manhaeve, agents)
Re:
First, application for annulment of the decision adopted by the Commission following an audit report by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) to recover, by way of the debit note of 17 January 2007, payments made in the framework of the contract, reference number IST-1999-10934-Assist relating to the ‘Knowledge for Help Desk Operators’ programme, concluded in the context of the Fifth Framework Programme of the Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (1998-2002) in the field of user-friendly information, second, a request for payment of EUR 34 368 in respect of an instalment of a grant still to be paid under the contract and, third, a claim for compensation for damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of that decision.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Imelios SA is to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 129, 9.6.2007.