I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2013/C 123/28
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: K-Swiss, Inc. (California, United States) (represented by: R. Niebel and K. Tasma, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Künzli SwissSchuh AG (Windisch, Switzerland)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), dated 30 October 2012 in Case R 174/2011-2; and
—Order the defendant and, as appropriate, the intervener to bear the costs of the action.
Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The figurative mark representing a trainer with five stripes — Community trade mark registration No 4 771 978
Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant
Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: The grounds of the request for a declaration of invalidity were those laid down in Article 52(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009
Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declared the contested Community trade mark invalid
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.