EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-521/10: Action brought on 9 November 2010 — Confortel Gestión v OHIM — Homargrup (CONFORTEL AQUA 4)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TN0521

62010TN0521

November 9, 2010
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/41

(Case T-521/10)

()

2011/C 30/74

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Confortel Gestión, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: I. Valdelomar Serrano)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Homargrup, SA (Santa Susana, Spain)

Form of order sought

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 5 August 2010 in Case R 1359/2009-2, and consequently register Community trade mark No 5.276.951 ‘CONFORTEL Aqua 4’ for all of the classes sought, and

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Confortel Gestión, SA.

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘CONFORTEL Aqua 4’ for services in Classes 41, 43 and 44.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Homargrup, SA.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community word mark ‘AQUA’ and Community figurative mark ‘A AQUA HOTEL’ and Spanish word marks ‘AQUAMARINA’ and ‘AQUATEL’, and Spanish figurative mark ‘AQUAMAR’, for services in Class 42.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Plea in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, since there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.

Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia