I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2014/C 261/65
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Premo, SL (Campanillas, Spain) (represented by: E. Cornu, F. de Visscher and E. De Gryse, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Prema Semiconductor GmbH (Mainz, Germany)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 April 2014 in Case R 1000/2013-5;
—Subsidiarily, annul the contested decision to the extent that it upheld the opposition regarding ‘inductors’, ‘transformers’ and ‘noise filters’;
—Order OHIM, and if appropriate the intervening party, to pay the costs.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The international registration designating the European Union for the figurative mark containing the word element ‘PREMO’, for goods in Class 9 — International registration designating the European Union No 973 341
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Prema Semiconductor GmbH
Mark or sign cited in opposition: The national word mark ‘PREMA’ for goods in Class 9
Decision of the Opposition Division: The opposition was partially upheld
Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeal was partially dismissed
Pleas in law:
—Infringement of Rule 22(6) of Commission Regulation No. 2868/95 and the rights of defence of the applicant;
—Infringement of Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.