EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-131/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — European Commission v CX (Appeal — Civil Service — Disciplinary proceedings — Rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 4 — Opportunity for the official who cannot be heard to comment in writing or to be represented — Article 22 — Hearing of the official by the Appointing Authority prior to the adoption of the disciplinary penalty — Alleged inability of the official to be heard and to make written submissions or to be represented — Assessment of medical evidence — Failure of the General Court of the European Union to reply to arguments raised at first instance)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0131

62019CA0131

June 25, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

24.8.2020

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/10

(Case C-131/19 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Appeal - Civil Service - Disciplinary proceedings - Rights of the defence - Right to be heard - Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - Article 4 - Opportunity for the official who cannot be heard to comment in writing or to be represented - Article 22 - Hearing of the official by the Appointing Authority prior to the adoption of the disciplinary penalty - Alleged inability of the official to be heard and to make written submissions or to be represented - Assessment of medical evidence - Failure of the General Court of the European Union to reply to arguments raised at first instance)

(2020/C 279/13)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid, T. S. Bohr and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: CX (represented by: É. Boigelot, avocat)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Annuls the judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2018, CX v Commission (T-743/16 RENV, not published, EU:T:2018:937);

2.Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;

3.Reserves the costs.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.

ECLI:EU:C:2020:140

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia