- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-893/16: Action brought on 19 December 2016 — Xiaomi v EUIPO — Apple (MI PAD)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0893
62016TN0893
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.2.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 46/26
(Case T-893/16)
(2017/C 046/29)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Xiaomi, Inc. (Beijing, China) (represented by: T. Raab and C. Tenkhoff, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Apple Inc. (Cupertino, California, United States)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘MI PAD’ — Application for registration No 12 780 987
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 September 2016 in Case R 363/2016-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.