EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-161/23: Action brought on 25 March 2023 — Schönegger Käse-Alm v EUIPO — Jumpseat3D plus Germany (Rebell)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0161

62023TN0161

March 25, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

15.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/38

(Case T-161/23)

(2023/C 173/50)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Schönegger Käse-Alm GmbH (Prem, Germany) (represented by: M.-C. Seiler, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Jumpseat3D plus Germany GmbH (Berlin, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark Rebell — EU trade mark No 2 810 950

Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 January 2023 in Case R 295/2022-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision in so far as EU trade mark No 2 810 950 Rebell is declared invalid for the following goods in Class 29: ‘Milk products, in particular butter, butter preparations, clarified butter, butter oils, quark, quark desserts, milk products, dried milk products, dietetic foodstuffs made using milk and milk products’;

annul the contested decision in so far as the applicant was ordered to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings;

order EUIPO and Jumpseat3D plus Germany GmbH, should the other party to the proceedings intervene in the action brought against the defendant, to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Article 21(1)(e) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) and (2), in conjunction with the second sentence of Article 94(1), of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with the fourth sentence of Article 19(1) and Article 10(3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia