EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-97/13: Action brought on 20 December 2013 — ZZ v FRA

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013FN0097

62013FN0097

December 20, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

22.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/26

(Case F-97/13)

2014/C 85/44

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Laure, M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

To annul the decision to nominate another candidate to the Senior Programme Manager position in FRA and the implicit decision not to nominate the applicant to the other position of Senior Programme Manager, mentioned in the vacancy notice.

Form of order sought

Annul the Director’s decision of 5th February 2013 informing the Applicant that the Director of FRA had chosen to appoint another candidate to the position of Senior Programme Manager — Social Research (AD8) and, as a consequence, not to appoint her to this position;

annul the undated implicit decision not to appoint her to the other position as Senior Programme Manager in the vacancy notice;

annul any decision taken on the basis of these illegal decisions;

annul the decision of 11th July 2013 insofar as it rejects the Applicant’s complaint and as it refuses to initiate an administrative inquiry, conducted by an unquestionably unbiased, impartial and objective investigator, in order to establish the facts;

compensate the material prejudice suffered by the Applicant estimated at 550 651 euros;

compensate the moral prejudice suffered by the Applicant estimated at 70 000 euros;

order the Defendant to pay for all costs.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia