- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-684/17: Action brought on 4 October 2017 — Amorepacific v EUIPO — Primavera Life (p primera Pure Sprout Energy)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0684
62017TN0684
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-684/17)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Amorepacific Corporation (Seoul, Korea) (represented by: B. Führmeyer and F. Klein, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Primavera Life GmbH (Oy-Mittelberg, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘p primera Pure Sprout Energy’ — Application for registration No 13 151 683
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 July 2017 in Case R 1744/2016-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—amend the contested decision by rejecting the opposition in its entirety;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.