- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-332/16: Action brought on 15 June 2016 — Colgate-Palmolive v EUIPO (360°)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0332
62016TN0332
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 296/32
(Case T-332/16)
(2016/C 296/42)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Colgate-Palmolive Co. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: M. Zintler and A. Stolz, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘360°’ — Application for registration No 14 042 162
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 April 2016 in Case R 2288/2015-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c), (2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 and of the rules of law relating to its application as set out in Article 65(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.