- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-156/19: Action brought on 12 March 2019 — Koenig & Bauer v EUIPO (we’re on it)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0156
62019TN0156
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.4.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 148/63
(Case T-156/19)
(2019/C 148/63)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Koenig & Bauer AG (Würzburg, Germany) (represented by: B. Reinisch, B. Sorg and M. Ringer, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: Registration of EU word mark we’re on it — Application for registration No 16 983 066
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 January 2019 in Case R 1027/2018-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and amend it to the effect that EUIPO’s decision of 23 April 2018 rejecting EU trade mark application No 16 983 066 is annulled, continue the registration procedure of EU trade mark application No 16 983 066 and refund the applicant (applicant for the contested mark) the costs incurred in relation to the appeal;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 94(1), first sentence, of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 94(1), second sentence, of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.