- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2012. # Hamas v Council of the European Union. # Annulment action - Restrictive measures with a view to combating terrorism - Lis pendens. # Case T-531/11.
ECLI:EU:T:2012:317
62011TO0531
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Annulment action — Restrictive measures with a view to combating terrorism — Lis pendens
Re:
Initially, action for annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 687/2011 of 18 July 2011 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism, and repealing Implementing Regulations No 610/2010 and (EU) No 83/2011 (OJ 2011 L 188, p. 2), and Council Decision 2011/430/CFSP of 18 July 2011 updating the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism (OJ 2011 L 188, p. 47), in so far as the applicant organisation’s name is maintained on the list of persons, groups and entities to which the freezing of funds and economic resources laid down with a view to combating terrorism.
Operative part
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.There is no need to give a ruling on the European Commission’s application for leave to intervene.
3.Hamas is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Council of the European Union.