I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-509/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Environment - Regulation (EU) 2019/631 - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1153 - Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1035 - Carbon dioxide emissions - Testing methodology - Passenger cars - Amendment of the contested decision as regards the applicant - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 303/57)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Daimler AG (Stuttgart, Germany) (represented by: N. Wimmer, C. Arhold and G. Ollinger, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Hermes and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents)
By application lodged at the General Court Registry on 14 August 2020, the applicant brought the present action under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1035 of 3 June 2020 confirming or amending the provisional calculation of the average specific emissions of CO2 and specific emissions targets for manufacturers of passenger cars and light commercial vehicles for the calendar year 2018 pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/631 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2020 L 227, p. 37).
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Daimler AG.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 320, 28.9.2020.