- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-37/21: Action brought on 19 January 2021 — KF v EIB
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0037
62021TN0037
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.4.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 148/18
(Case T-37/21)
(2021/C 148/26)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: KF (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)
Defendant: European Investment Bank
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the defendant’s decision dated 13 October 2020;
—grant compensation for the moral prejudice suffered; and
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging violation of Article 8 (1), Article 46 (1) and Article 51 (1) of the defendant’s Pension Scheme Regulations and a manifest error of appreciation of the legal concept of invalidity.
2.Second plea in law, alleging lack of impartiality by the defendant.