- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-488/11: Action brought on 9 September 2011 — Sarc v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TN0488
62011TN0488
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.11.2011
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 331/26
(Case T-488/11)
2011/C 331/50
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Scheepsbouwkundig Advies- en Rekencentrum (Sarc) BV (Bussum, Netherlands) (represented by: H. Speyart, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
—Annul Commission decision C(2011) 642 final of 10 May 2011 given in the State aid proceedings NN 68/2010 declaring that the aid granted does not constitute State aid; and
—Order the European Commission to pay its own costs and those incurred by the applicant.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.
First plea in law, alleging
—that the Commission failed, where it should have done so, to open the formal investigation procedure within the meaning of Article 108(2) TFEU;
Second plea in law, alleging
—that the Commission, in a further submission, failed to associate SARC in its preliminary assessment in a sufficient manner;
Third plea in law, alleging
—that the Commission misapplied Article 107 (1) TFEU;
Fourth plea in law, alleging
—that the Commission failed, where it should have done so, to order the Dutch authorities to submit an evaluation, or to commission an independent evaluation;
Fifth plea in law, alleging
—that the Commission failed to reason its decision to the required standard.