EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Corrigendum to the Case T-534/24 (OJ C, C/2024/7364, 16.12.2024)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0534R(01)

62024TN0534R(01)

March 10, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/90018

10.3.2025

Corrigendum to the Case C-534/24

(Official Journal of the European Union C, C/2024/7364, 16 December 2024)

The Case T-534/24, Gotek, should read as follows:

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravni sud u Osijeku (Croatia) lodged on 8 October 2024 – MK v Ministarstvo financija Republike Hrvatske, Samostalni sektor za drugostupanjski upravni postupak

(Case T-534/24, Gotek)

(C/2024/7364)

Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Upravni sud u Osijeku

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: MK

Defendant: Ministarstvo financija Republike Hrvatske, Samostalni sektor za drugostupanjski upravni postupak

Question referred

Must Council Directive 2008/118/EC of 16 December 2008 concerning the general arrangements for excise duty and repealing Directive 92/12/EEC, in particular Articles 7 and 8 thereof, and/or Council Directive (EU) 2020/262 of 19 December 2019 laying down the general arrangements for excise duty (recast), be interpreted as precluding national practice (and legislation) which provides for an obligation to pay excise duty on energy products where the excise goods have not been used and an excise duty liability has been established in respect of goods stated in falsified invoices for the purchase of energy products which, precisely because they have been falsified, do not give rise to the right to deduct input VAT because there are fictitious supplies of energy products, as has also been finally established in criminal proceedings?

The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 12.

OJ L 58, 27.2.2020, p. 4 and corrigenda (OJ L 188, 27.7.2023, p. 60 and OJ L 409, 4.12.2020, p. 38).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7364/corrigendum/2025-03-10/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia