- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-46/12: Order of the General Court of 5 March 2013 — Chrysamed Vertrieb v OHIM — Chrysal International (Chrysamed) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for registration — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TB0046
62012TB0046
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 142/34
(Case T-46/12)(1)
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))
2014/C 142/44
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Chrysamed Vertrieb GmbH (Salzburg, Austria) (represented by: initially T. Schneider, subsequently M. Koch and finally I. Rungg, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Chrysal International BV (Naarden, Netherlands) (represented by: A. Killan, M. Marell and M. Senftleben, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 November 2011 (Case R 64/2011-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Chrysal International BV and Chrysamed Vertrieb GmbH
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Chrysamed Vertrieb GmbH shall pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 98, 31.3.2012.