- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-526/24: Action brought on 14 October 2024 – Global Legal Action Network v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0526
62024TN0526
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/7044
(Case T-526/24)
(C/2024/7044)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Global Legal Action Network (Galway, Ireland) (represented by: J. Fiala-Butora and E. Fiala-Butora, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the Commission’s decision, set out in a letter of 6 August 2024, by which the Commission rejected a request for internal review brought by the applicant pursuant to Article 10 of the Aarhus Regulation (1);
—order the defendant to pay the costs;
—order any other measure deemed appropriate.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that the defendant erred in law in claiming that the Contested Act is not imputable to the defendant and is therefore not an act adopted by it for the purpose of Article 10(1) of the Aarhus Regulation.
2.Second plea in law, alleging that the defendant erred in law in claiming that the Contested Act did not produce legal and external effects.
3.Third plea in law, alleging that the defendant erred in law when it did not consider the applicant’s request for internal review on the merits. Under Article 10(2) of the Aarhus Regulation.
Language of the case: English
(1) OJ L 264, 2006, p. 13.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7044/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—