- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Opinion of Mr Advocate General Mischo delivered on 11 January 1990. # Erich Wittmann GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Nürnberg-Fürth. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Finanzgericht München - Germany. # Common Customs Tariff - Ear-piercing instruments and stud earrings. # Case C-344/88.
ECLI:EU:C:1990:9
61988CC0344
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Important legal notice
61988C0344
European Court reports 1990 Page I-01505 Pub.RJ Page Pub somm
Opinion of the Advocate-General
++++
Mr Advocate General Mischo delivered his Opinion on 11 January 1990 . (*) He proposed that the Court should give the following two answers to the questions referred by the Finanzgericht Muenchen :
( 1 ) Heading 71.16 of the Common Customs Tariff must be interpreted as having included, even before the adoption of Commission Regulation No 3558/81 of 8 December 1981, shanks for earrings of the kind designated in that regulation .
( 2 ) Subheading 84.59 E II must be interpreted as including the guns designed to pierce the ear-lobe and insert the object referred to in the answer to the first question .
(*) Original language : French .