I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
()
(2010/C 288/111)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: Rubinetterie Teorema SpA (Flero, Brescia, Italy) (represented by: R. Cavani, lawyer, M. Di Muro, lawyer, P. Preda, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
—Annul Decision C(2010) 4185 of 23 June 2010;
—In the alternative, impose a token fine;
—In the further alternative, substantially reduce the fine imposed by the decision to such amount as the Court deems appropriate;
—Order the Commission to pay the costs.
The decision contested in these proceedings is the same as that contested in Case T-368/10 Rubinetteria Cisal v Commission.
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in that case.
In particular, the applicant alleges:
—Infringement of the rights of the defence in relation to Teorema and the consequent invalidity of the decision owing to:
—the delay in communicating to Teorema the accusations made by the Commission;
—the difficulties in accessing the file and the lack of an adequate extension of the time-limits;
—The fact that there is no agreement whose purpose or effect is to prevent, restrict or distort competition and/or no adverse effects on Community trade, and
—The incorrect assessment of the evidence relating to the alleged involvement of Teorema in Euroitalia’s meetings.