I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
(Case T-259/24)
(C/2024/3923)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Tarek Kudsi Alattar (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: J. Gallego Jiménez, E. Sanz Valls, P. Bauzá Martínez and Y. Hernández Viñes, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Medelhavet Gross AB (Laholm, Sweden)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark Chamain – European Union trade mark No 18 329 240
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 February 2024 in joined cases R 1258/2023-2 and R 1588/2023-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—uphold the decision of the Second Board of Appeal in Case R 1258/2023-2;
—dismiss in part the cancellation applicant’s appeal R 1588/2023-2 and maintain the contested decision to the extent that the trade mark at issue remains valid for the following goods:
—Class 5: dietetic food and substances adapted for medical use; dietary supplements for humans;
—Class 31: fresh herbs;
—order the EUIPO (and if it intervenes, the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal) to bear its costs and pay those of the applicant.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR (Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3923/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—