EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-259/24: Action brought on 16 May 2024 – Kudsi Alattar v EUIPO – Medelhavet Gross (Chamain)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0259

62024TN0259

May 16, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/3923

(Case T-259/24)

(C/2024/3923)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Tarek Kudsi Alattar (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: J. Gallego Jiménez, E. Sanz Valls, P. Bauzá Martínez and Y. Hernández Viñes, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Medelhavet Gross AB (Laholm, Sweden)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark Chamain – European Union trade mark No 18 329 240

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 February 2024 in joined cases R 1258/2023-2 and R 1588/2023-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

uphold the decision of the Second Board of Appeal in Case R 1258/2023-2;

dismiss in part the cancellation applicant’s appeal R 1588/2023-2 and maintain the contested decision to the extent that the trade mark at issue remains valid for the following goods:

Class 5: dietetic food and substances adapted for medical use; dietary supplements for humans;

Class 31: fresh herbs;

order the EUIPO (and if it intervenes, the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal) to bear its costs and pay those of the applicant.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR (Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3923/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia