I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(Case T-349/22)
(2022/C 284/80)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Hacker-Pschorr Bräu GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: C. Tenkhoff and T. Herzog, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Jana Vandělíková (Prague, Czech Republic)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark HACKER SPACE — Application for registration No 18 144 157
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 April 2022 in Case R 1268/2021-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.
—Infringement of Article 47(5) and Article 46 in conjunction with Article 8(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament;
—Infringement of Articles 2(c) and 7(1) of Commission delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;
—Infringement of the principle of equal treatment and sound administration, including the principle of procedural economy, Article 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.