- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-552/22: Action brought on 7 September 2022 — mataharispaclub v EUIPO — Rouha (SpaClubMatahari)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0552
62022TN0552
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.10.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 408/41
(Case T-552/22)
(2022/C 408/55)
Language in which the application was lodged: Czech
Parties
Applicant: mataharispaclub s.r.o. (Mníšek pod Brdy, Czech Republic) (represented by: M. Diamant, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Alena Rouha (Prague, Czech Republic)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘SpaClubMatahari’ — EU trade mark No 17 642 661
Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 June 2022 in Case R 937/2021-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 8(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.