- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-716/23, Skycop.com: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 27 November 2023 — ‘Skycop.com’ UAB v Ryanair DAC
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0716
62023CN0716
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
Series C
C/2024/1087
5.2.2024
(C/2024/1087)
Language of the case: Lithuanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: ‘Skycop.com’ UAB
Respondent: Ryanair DAC
Questions referred
1.Is Article 6(1)(iii) of Regulation No 261/2004 (1) establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, read in conjunction with Article 8(1)(a) thereof, to be interpreted as meaning that passengers who refused to take a flight that was delayed by at least five hours and for whom that flight was no longer serving any purpose are entitled to the compensation provided for in Article 7 of that regulation?
2.If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, what conditions must be met for such a passenger to be entitled to compensation under Article 7 of Regulation No 261/2004, or is such a passenger entitled to compensation irrespective of the reason why the passenger refused to take a flight that was delayed by at least five hours?
(1) OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1087/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)