- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-444/24: Action brought on 23 August 2024 – Montres Tudor v EUIPO (1926)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0444
62024TN0444
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/5848
7.10.2024
(Case T-444/24)
(C/2024/5848)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Montres Tudor SA (Geneva, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Mesa Sánchez and I. Pascual de Quinto Santos-Suárez, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark ‘1926’ – Application for registration No 1 745 423
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 June 2024 in Case R 600/2024-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Inconsistency as regards the goods in respect of which the contested international registration is regarded as distinctive.
—The trade mark applied for does not describe the characteristics of the goods claimed. Inapplicability of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—The contested international registration is inherently distinctive. Inapplicability of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5848/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—