- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-248/21: Order of the General Court of 5 May 2022 — Fibrecycle v EUIPO — (BACK-2-NATURE) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TB0248
62021TB0248
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.7.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 284/33
(Case T-248/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 284/42)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Fibrecycle Pty Ltd (Helensvale, Australia) (represented by: T. Stein, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 March 2021 (Case R 1699/2020-2), relating to the international registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark BACK-2-NATURE.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 252, 28.6.2021.