I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
(Case T-12/23) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for an EU figurative mark representing a lightning bolt - Earlier EU figurative mark representing a lightning bolt - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/953)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Beauty Boutique sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. Nowakowski, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann and J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Lightningbolt Europe SA (São Cosme Vale, Portugal) (represented by: P. Sousa e Silva, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 5 October 2022 (Case R 668/2022-5).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Beauty Boutique sp. z o.o. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Lightningbolt Europe SA for the purposes of the proceedings before the General Court;
3.Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.
*
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/953/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)